EPISODE 408 • OCTOBER 12, 2026
Connect with Jonathan Green
The cloud isn't actually in the sky. And we're going to find all about it with today's amazing special guest, Stephanie Cox. So Stephanie, one of the things I think problem with the term the cloud is that we for some reason imagine it's in the sky, like the internet lives in these cloud ships or in these zeppelins flying around the air. And that's not really true. And I think the most important thing we're hearing a lot about this now is where does the electricity for the
cloud and for these data centers actually come from? Yeah, great, great question. Always a hot topic of choice, but the the energy that's shaping the cloud is coming from all sorts of different technologies from wind, solar, traditional oil and gas, and then a major demand on the grid itself. So we're seeing demand increases as as we work through these different technologies of AI. I think it all comes down to demand and and what the strains are being put on the grid itself.
Right now we're just seeing AIs become just the biggest new electricity hog we've seen in generations. Suddenly we're building new pr nuclear power plants again. We're looking at changing how we operate things. And there's a big shift to these data centers. And the thing I kind of wonder is if it's really the right direction. Like computers were huge in the sixties and they're now they're as small as a cell phone. I mean, do you th it feels like as soon as we build these
AI data centers, AI will fit in my phone anyway. So are we kind of going jumping at something that's only a short term need and that in three years all these data centers are gonna be there turned off. Yeah, that my my hope is, you know, the short term need in terms of just massive capacity needed. So we have these major hyperscalers, these large data centers that we're seeing. ~ I I personally would love to see data centers ~ more at a a smaller scale
so that the communities around it can not have so much land and water requirements, anything like that. but definitely AI is creating a large new source of electricity demand. So It's shifting how how we see the different load profiles that the grid was originally designed to support. So that's kind of the biggest change with these massive centers coming in. ~ you know, we see large AI training models and hyperscale dators that are just requiring enormous ~ amounts of this continuous power.
~ you know, we normally we'd see with the grid of of power based on these peak events, weather events, anything like that, but the data centers and the demand that AI is creating is creating just a different type of shift than what we've traditionally seen before. One of these hyperscalers needs a gigawatt of energy for a new AI data center. What happens? Where does the plan meet reality? Yeah, so a lot of that is is hidden challenges that we see driving where some
of the coordination early on is happening. So it's not just that, hey, we need power, we're having these new data centers, it's the amount of planning that's required. So in traditional energy usage, it's figuring out land permits, water, a lot of community involvement. So we're seeing that just at a bigger scale too, and kind of a new shift, but it's creating more of a dichotomy between is the power going to the data center or is the power going to communities?
So from the early play stage of planning, we see you know, securing this power is requiring more than just a power purchase agreement. So the developers, the owners, all the parties involved need to navigate transmission lines, different interconnection cues, ~ permitting water requirements, land availability and and local workforces and definitely that community support that I stressed on too. So we're we're seeing some changes going on with that and just a lot of different demand that we didn't see a decade ago.
AI is shifting so fast with new models every few weeks and the chips they need and the requirements change every eighteen months or on a shorter cycle. But substations can take years to build. How do those two things kind of meet? Where AI wants to be fast, but infrastructure is slow. It just works at the pace of construction. Yeah, that's that's always the big challenge. I I'd say, you know, from my perspective, ~ a bridging technology has been energy storage, especially in the last few years.
It's it's been the bridging technology for just the differences between renewable and traditional energy. But then same with AI and data centers as well. So we're seeing that Software is kind of building at its own pace and a lot faster than what the grid and infrastructure can keep up with. But having energy storage kind of bridge that gap while while equipment catches up has g been a just a key factor because we're still facing supply chain, anything like that is is just can't keep
up with the pace of of software growth. There's been a lot of talk of building data centers in unique locations, whether it's under the ocean or in outer space. How realistic is all of that? And is it just a distraction or is it a real possibility? You know, that's a a funny question. My my personal opinion is i it's a distraction. I mean, even even right now, these massive data centers, they're they're all simply science projects. We haven't seen something like this in
previous decades and they've been deployed maybe, you know, they have been deployed but at a much smaller scale. But the scales that they're deploying right now are these larger hyperscalers. So I think having different areas to deploy, as you mentioned. ~ in in oceans, anything like that is is all helping to solve different problems, maybe from a heat standpoint, anything like that. But at the end of the day, it's it's still just newer technology coming in the ground that still needs to be
hashed out between different parties. So if if there's more of a focus on how we figure out this land demand and the balance between just the grid on the grid itself versus getting water or space or anything like that. I think that's that's kind of the focus that I hope we we remain. We've already seen AI really affect some markets. Like the price of RAM is continually going up, up, up 'cause they're buying all of the chips for now and it's really affecting
personal computers and other sectors. Even large companies like Sony can't get the chips for PlayStations anymore. So prices of everything like there's this fallen effect. And as AI needs more and more power, are we gonna start to see our power bills go up and up and up? And At what point are people going to decide, well, I don't want AI this much? And it's going to lead to that shift where it's the cost benefit analysis switches and people turn against AI.
Yeah, I think I think two parts to your question is you know, one around pricing. I think from an energy market standpoint, there's there's been fluctuations, whether that's a political landscape, the different types of technologies, you know, we'll see different pockets, such as in California, Texas, kind of these hot spots that we've seen over the last couple decades, that newer technologies get brought onto the grid, cheaper power, anything like that. So I think we'll see that. replicate acl across the data center landscape as well.
So right now I think prices are still increasing. Everything's kind of matching the oil index as well and and how we see that. But I think there's enough healthy technology coming to the mix. And my personal opinion is is we need it all. You know, I've I've historically been in the renewable space, but agnostic to energy at the end of the day, because it's it's that healthy balance and load shifting that we do need. So pricing, my hope is will get driven
down just as more people become receptive to receiving different types of technology and thermals making more of a comeback, nuclear is coming back too. So we'll see that shift. So I'd say that's that's where it's at with pricing. ~ your second point on communities kind of getting involved, and there's actually a good good ~ case study that was from the Nevada Energy is They had notified some communities of hey, this power is gonna go to data centers if if that needs to be the primary demand.
So we are seeing a little bit of of shift from where communities might have a little bit more pushback. I was I was recently attended a webinar that there was some stat that I thought was astronomical but said 90% of folks in the US don't necessarily want the data centers, all these hyperscalers coming. coming into play because it's affecting where do you balance data center getting the power versus communities and livelihood getting the power too. So I think there's a hot topic debate that
will still come out, but you know it's it's just coming down at the local community levels as well. Yeah, I think that in the past, when we've built infrastructure products, there's also been a lot of jobs that come with it. But data centers don't really have a lot of people inside of them. So there's this big cost, but not as much benefit to the community. So we're seeing a lot of communities think go, our prices are going up. We have power lines thrown over the city.
There's all these negatives, but there's no positives for us. Maybe there's some taxes for the people in charge, but it's not really helping the community. And so we're seeing a lot of pushback. And one of the things that interests me is like we talk a lot about water and heat as a waste product is isn't there a way to turn the heat back into electricity to kind of get a benefit from that instead of just throwing it all away? Like I thought we have geo geothermal
energy and these other resources. Is there a more efficient way to use that or something smarter we could be doing? Yeah, I I think there's some great opportunities for as we see this adva coming to the grid, it'll promote other technologies to pop up too and kind of have that different advancement and how we utilize the waste side of it. So to your point, the the thermal energy and water from that is great capture. But again, I think it becomes the issue of
how do we get that captured energy back into transmission so that it's being used for something. Outside of just what's locally available on the site. But I've heard of yeah, some some different areas around the water being for data centers, as well as where we see these different microgrids for energy storage popping up in local communities and and folks that are close to these areas being able to push their power back to the grid too if they have some solar or anything like that.
So it's it's kind of a mix of of where we see the current infrastructure, but I do think there's a lot of opportunity for how we can make these different types of technologies or different load demands be a lot more efficient than what they currently are. Biggest hottest topic right now is these hyperscalers, these massive AI data centers. And to me, then math never seems to work out because right now chips used in AI are obsolete within 18 months and that cycle keeps shortening.
So I've seen smaller data centers spend like millions of dollars on chips that eighteen months later are considered obsolete and they don't recover the cost in that quickly. Right, because it's takes a long time in rental price, because the rental price is so much less than the purchase price. What do you think all these investors are kind of getting wrong when we look at this, whether it's the energy or the water or the land space or the locations or the power needs?
Because we keep I think to me it seems like the thing we're forgetting is that we're constantly becoming more efficient. Like the model that can fit inside of your phone now, which I think is what everyone really wants. We want a local model, not something that's far away, not in a data center. That's the future everyone wants. And I feel like the shift is going to be in that direction. So my feeling is we're going build all these data centers,
and by the time we build them, AIs will be so efficient we don't need them. Like it's this ~ problem that the second we solve it, we don't need that solution, anyways. But what maybe I'm wrong, and I want to get your opinion. Like, what do you think investors are getting wrong by pouring all their money into this idea where there's all these data centers, but we don't really know if there's a long term it's very exciting, I guess, in that field.
Like everyone wants to jump in on it, but is it the right long term move and what are they kind of missing, in your opinion? Yeah, that's a that's a super interesting topic because it's you know, especially is if I if I can rel relate it back to the renewables market is a lot of renewables today have been driven by tax credits. So it's investors jumping in to kind of get a piece of that. And to your point too, is just where they
can get a piece of the data centers and you know, capitalize on this twelve to eighteen months plan. So I think there's a good mix of of folks just jumping in right away. But some of the investor folks and the clients that we work with, they are looking five years out and trying to model that decline that I think I agree with you is that you know maybe there'll there'll be a decline in and where we see this because the technology becomes obsolete.
We might not have as much demand. Software is getting smarter so that we won't have to build this intense amount of chips and processing. And the hope is that as we innovate, everything does become a little bit more efficient. So I think there's a healthy amount of companies and investors that are looking for more than just, you know, a two-year out, they're looking five to ten. And they're really looking to diversify where they have their portfolio. So I think investors today, at least from
the clients we work with, are being a little bit smarter, a little bit more savvy about comparing cost benefit of the energy side of it, where their portfolios invested in that, in addition to capitalizing on this near term opportunity in in anticipation of that decline. So that's my opinion. I share the same with you of just let's hope things become more efficient as we've seen. I mean, three years ago I I know companies talking about policies around chat GPT and here we are today.
So what is an accelerated path of the next three to five years look like? There's a lot of abandoned businesses, whether it's malls that are closed all over America or old hotels and all these data centers we're building, do you think there's a po what happens when we build more than we need and they're kind of the pullback happens and suddenly there's these abandoned massive mega centers? Will the improvements we've made to the grid then benefit All the people in those communities that
had the initial negative effect will kind of switch. Well, now we have a stronger grid and there's so much more capacity we need. So the price of electricity will plummet. Is that a possibility? I I think that's a possibility. I I smirk because we could go into some rabbit holes around, yeah, sustainability and these abandoned spaces because that that's gonna be an issue coming into that. But I I think that's a a major possibility of what happens when these massive pieces of land,
equipment, building space is no longer needed. And I think with anything, you know, I try to look at the positive of what's what's the opportunity that's created. years down. And so I think there'll there'll be a lot of space for secondary ~ the sustainability side. I know there's folks looking into and researching even everywhere from the the abandoned malls to have the vertical agricultural growth because it's already a compliant building. You already have the HVAC system kind of in the mix with that.
So hopefully people are planning ahead too. But I think that that definitely broaches a new topic of ~ sustainability in that sense too, which is close to the heart, especially on where we see all the waste of equipment, aging, anything like that. Yeah, it really seems like we are so excited about the technology that we're not you very rarely hear people talk about sustainability anymore, where it was a really important term a few years ago. Now it's like I mean, we haven't built a
nuclear facility in America since the 70s. I think that's when we started the moratorium. And now suddenly everyone's buying reactors. They're firing up Three Mile Island again, they're doing all of these things. You're talking about micro reactors and So the mindset about nuclear has shifted so fast from it's the worst thing ever, never do it again to let's build a bunch. There was no middle transitional period. And we're seeing the same thing where I think at first it seems you see the benefits, but communities are
starting to see, wait, you're gonna take all the power, the power's gonna go up, there's no jobs, it's gonna take a lot of infrastructure. And we're starting to see kind of the cost benefit. When we look five or ten years out, what do you think? The future really is going to be like when AI, data center, storage, and the grid actually converge. What do you think the future will be like in five or ten years? I I would say I expect and hope for a more
diversified and resilient ecosystem. You know, ever everything learning from the past, ~ to your point where people are just kinda chasing a shiny ball for lack of better terms, too. And but I think now there's a lot more collaboration that's known and needed to get projects in the ground efficiently, to have a right execution plan in place, the right partners. So ~ five to ten years. Yeah, I hope we're relying more on more than just one technology. the distributed data centers,
like I mentioned, not these hyperscalers. I think it'll be based on where we see higher demand. Right now it's based on land availability from what I'm seeing. And then just a broader mix of generation source sources with storage, smarter grid controls, and I'd say just AI itself. helping to optimize the electricity demand. So that that's my hope. ~ where we see opportunities like that and I think these secondary markets that are coming up. ~ one one piece of of GridEQ side that we're leaning into is
all the secondary equipment that is unused. you know, projects get canceled because interconnection cues and timeline, supply chain shifts, anything like that. And so part of GridEQ business is is helping to find homes for this brand new equipment that hasn't come up. So I think there's again opportunity for helping to balance that out and just people being creative with with where we can be a little bit more efficient and a lot more sustainable. I think this is a really important conversation.
It sometimes gets lost in all the excitement. Either people are very pro AI or very anti, but we forget all the secondary markets infrastructure behind it. So this is really, really useful. So you tell us a little bit about what you do and where people can find you in GridEQ? Yeah, so so GridEQ at our core, we're a an advisory intelligence firm. so we provide consulting work, working with investors, developers, different owners. started this company a little over a year ago with
a business partner, and we saw just a a gap in all this growth and demand and the lack of clarity really when it comes to finding partners, the right teams to execute. So ~ some of the advisory services we provide as a shining a lot more light on the companies that investors might be looking to put their money in, how projects are being built with the different partners out there. So that's our core. And then ~ as I mentioned previously,
we we recently launched a new business line about five months ago for this secondary market look focusing on transformers and breakers and all this long lead equipment time that data centers different types of technologies all need to to actually get their projects in the ground. So we're hoping to just fill the gaps in in this crazy energy provide some clarity and and hope to bring a lot more projects to speed a lot faster and with a lot more intelligence behind it.
It's amazing. Thank you so much for sharing and being with us today for another amazing episode of the Artificial Intelligence Podcast. Thank you, Jonathan. Appreciate it.